10 December 2012

A350-800 not to be cancelled but A330 improved to maintain 787 under pressure


Airbus said it will stick with the smallest variant of its A350 XWB family to provide a challenger for every version of Boeing’s 787, even after launch customer Qatar Airways switched to the A350-1000 bigger model.

Scrapping the baseline plane would leave Airbus vulnerable to the similar 787-9, Chief Operating Officer John Leahy said in an interview.
A350-800 key changes vs 900. Courtesy EADS Global Investor Forum

Airbus’s older A330, which won some earlier competitions against 787, doesn’t have the range to combat the 787-9 and even the 787-8, Leahy said, adding: “For the longer range you’ll need the A350-800.” 800 A330s have been sold since 787 launch and there is a A330 take-off or landing every 25 seconds, with 99.0% reliability.

Airbus is meanwhile looking at increasing production of the A330 to 11 aicraft a month, up from 9.5 now and 10 next spring, Leahy said. A330 orders continue arriving to Airbus headquarters.

Based on article “Airbus to Stick With A350-800 Even as Airlines Favor Bigger Jets” published in Bloomberg.

09 December 2012

MIRA augmented reality technology used for checking the pylon assembly



In the Pylon Assembly line, it has been used MiRA (Mixed Reality Application), a three-dimensional (3D) viewing device, to save time and cost.

 click the image to watch the video of the pylon assembly&check process

In 2009, EADS Innovation Works and Airbus set about developing a collaborative project to help automate the aircraft production process. Three years later, Airbus quality inspectors in St.Eloy are using MiRA, to compare aircraft on the production line with their 3D digital mock-ups.
click the image to watch the video of the pylon assembly&check process

The genesis of MiRA took it through the following process:
- From 2009 Innovation Works developed MiRA’s technological foundations. This included software and hardware development and integration (camera and motion sensors).

 - In 2010, Innovation Works and Airbus built a business case for MiRA, while also progressing to a more mature prototype.
 - In early 2011, Airbus decided to fast track MiRA’s development, in order to ensure its availability in time for A350 XWB series production at the end of 2011. Technology development was completed and a production supply chain put in place

click the image to watch the video of the pylon assembly&check process
MiRA is now in use on the A380 and A350 XWB production lines, being used to check the secondary structural brackets that hold systems such as hydraulics and pipes in place. The target is to reduce the time needed to check tens of thousands of brackets in the fuselage as well as high reduction in late discoveries of damaged, wrongly positioned or missing brackets.

08 December 2012

VMU tail strike test will be one of the first to be done next summer


Almost all pilots and aircraft geeks have seen astonishing pictures of a test aircraft taking off with the tail scraping the runway with a lot of sparks coming from the rear fuselage during the testing for development and certification. The truth is that a specific tail bumper is added to protect the tail from any damage.

The provisions for tail bumper are already installed in the A350 XWB first aircraft MSN001.

This test allows to determine speeds which are called VMU (Velocity Minimum Unstick). Airbus needs to know the VMU because the computed take off speeds incorporate some margin above VMU, just as they also do for VS (Stall speed), VMCG (Minimum control speed on the ground) and VMCA (Minimum control speed in the air). These “V” speeds therefore form the basic building blocks of take-off performance.

The optimization of take-off performance is complex. Firstly, the aircraft must be able to get airborne safely, even in the case of failure of one engine. It may also have to overfly obstacles, close or far from the runway end, with sufficient margin, still with an engine failed. The optimization has to be performed for all weights, altitudes and temperatures and obviously some compromises have to be made, as no aircraft can be perfect for all conditions.



click the image to watch a video of the A380 VMU test
Among all development and certification tests, VMU are probably the most spectacular for observers, with the small “firework” below the tail just before lift-off. For crew members, they are also one of the most stressful, as the risk of damage to the aircraft is rather high. Few pilots can say that they have performed VMU tests on several programs without damaging anything!


In the case of the A350 XWB, some structural reinforcements and metallic protection are being made during the installation of the tail bumper so that it could sustain a force up to more than 150 tons. They can be seen in orange paint.

 

The VMU tests are difficult to carry out, mainly because it has to perform a soft touch down of the tail bumper, as the structure is not designed for a strong impact.

Perfect weather conditions are needed, with no turbulence and wind less than 5 kts, to insure the precision of the measurements. For these tests, all the audio warnings are “killed” by the crew prior to the test, otherwise the crew receive a stream of continuous warnings: “Thrust not set”, then “Stall, stall” and possibly some others.

On A380, a total of 22 VMU tests were executed including both development and certification.

 
The tests will be performed at Istres Air Force Base (South of France) where there is a 5 km runway and no houses or other obstacles on the runway axis for several kilometers.

  

A teamwork of 5 in the cabin:

The left hand seat pilot is responsible for flying the pitch. His seat is in the lowest position as he does not need to see the runway. He adjusts the attitude using the horizon of the PFD, performing a smooth touch-down of the tail bumper, keeping the tail on the ground until lift-off and maintaining the pitch attitude after take-off until out of the ground effect (one wing span) or 400 ft.


The right hand seat pilot has his seat in the upper position to be able to see the runway even with a high pitch attitude. On the ground, he maintains the aircraft on the runway. When in flight, he keeps the roll close to zero using very small inputs on the rudder (induced roll), and not with ailerons and spoilers to avoid a drag increase. Finally, he is responsible for safety, which means that he can take over anytime, typically if the aircraft is not climbing in ground effect.

The Test Flight Engineer on the flight deck is in charge of setting very precisely the thrust, which is important when they are performing tests at very low ratio thrust over weight.
 

In the cabin, in front of all their screens, 2 Flight Test Engineers are monitoring the test, and thanks to the traces, they validate it (or not).

 

 

 

07 December 2012

A350F all-cargo version will have to continue in the “development phase” and wait till 2020 although Cathay Pacific shows interest


Cathay Pacific wants Airbus to go ahead with an all-cargo version of its A350 model, which is currently in the development stage. Cathay has ordered altogether 46 A350s, which should begin to enter its fleet in 2016.
Nick Rhodes, the Hong Kong-based carrier’s director and general manager of cargo, acknowledged that in the present situation the case for an investment in freighters is well nigh hopeless. According to Rhodes, Cathay is bent on continuing to use freighters, despite the challenging situation.

The airline currently has all-Boeing fleet of 21 B747 wide-body freighters in its line-up. In the coming year it will take delivery of 2 more 747-8s, and its first of 8 B777-200F -earmarked for regional sectors- is due for delivery towards the end of 2013.

 Cathay has looked at the A330-200F, but with its 747 freighters covering regional markets and the 777F on the horizon, there is no need for an A330 freighter in the near future.

He would be more interested in a larger twin-engine cargo plane, namely a freighter version of the A350 XWB. An all-cargo variant of the A350 would give airlines an alternative to the 777 freighter and provide competition for Boeing in this wide-body freighter segment.

“There is a market niche for such an aircraft. In the future there will be more need for twin-engine freighters,” Rhodes said, adding that it would make sense for Cathay to take on an A350F, as it is in line for a sizeable number of A350s for its passenger fleet.

So far Airbus has not given any firm schedule for the production of a cargo version of the A350. The plane maker signalled that it would not begin work on this before all variants of the A350 are in production.

If A350F all-cargo version goes ahead in the future, it will have a very high conversion cost removing the CFRP floor beams to stronger Aluminium ones.

Freighters normally are the last thing OEMs develop, the market is much smaller, so is the return. The biggest competitor to new-build cargo aircraft from Airbus & Boeing's perspectives is not each other's dedicated cargo planes but the ready availability of cheap second hand passenger frames that can be converted at a fraction of the cost of a new build. But if the massive increase in fuel prices over the past few years continues for next decades, cargo airlines will require new build aircraft due their better fuel efficiency.

Last October/2012, in the TIACA held in Atlanta, Boeing presented it's new Cargo Forecast:
- World trade will expand at 6.5% per year through 2031, with air cargo traffic more than doubling, growing 5.2% in average every year.
-Fuel prices which rose dramatically since 2010, will remain being volatile, but stay moderate over the longer term.
-Regarding new freighters there is demand for 940 newly produced aircraft during this and the next decade. From these 940 entities 72% will be large freighters.
-Together with 1,820 passengers to freighter conversions this will lead to a 3.1% annual growth of the world's freighter fleet.
-Boeing sales of dedicated freighters since January 2002 (11 years) has been of around 345 aircraft (84-767, 127 777 and 135- 747)

Airbus is only offering the A330-200F to airlines, while Boeing offers a complete line of new-build models: "dirt cheap" 767-300F, vastly more capable 777 Freighter and new 747-8 Freighter. A380F was withdrew and remains in stand-by and A350F is only on the papers of a small team of experts –not even on the drawings-.



Based on article “Cathay keen on freighter version of Airbus A350” published in Cargo News Asia

06 December 2012

Strata in Abu Dhabi supplier of SABCA for flap track fairings progresses quickly with ATR workpackages

Strata Manufacturing (Strata), Mubadala Aerospace's advanced composite aerostructures plant in Al Ain, is working with Belgian Tier1 SABCA on the manufacturing of flap track fairings for A350 XWB, that will be similar to A330/A340 and A380 flap track fairings already manufactured in the same plant.

After only 10 months, the plant was qualified and supplying flap track fairings to Airbus for their A330s and A340s. This rapid turnaround would be a remarkable feat in any country, but considering that the factory site was only desert sand just a year before, the transition is even more remarkable.
SABCA is the Belgian Tier-1 Risk Sharing Partner for the design, industrialization and manufacturing of the A350XWB Flap Support Structures and Flap Support Fairings.

Much of Strata’s success can be linked to the skills and quality of the individuals it employs. In the past 12 months, Strata has been able to raise the proportion of UAE nationals working for the company from 1% to 33% - the majority of which are women. This promising trend is the result of a well-constructed education engagement strategy designed by Mubadala Aerospace, implemented by Strata.

ATR and Boeing.
The first vertical tail fin to be built in Abu Dhabi for an ATR regional airliner has been delivered by Strata from its factory in Al Ain.
“With the first package completed for the ATR Vertical Fin programme, Strata employees have shown their commitment to supplying vital structures to the highest standards of quality," said Mr De Mitri, senior vice president Alenia. "We are now looking to extend this collaboration to other programmes.

"If the UAE selects Eurofighter, we will be working with Strata to decide which packages it would be interested in delivering. We are no longer talking about a supplier relationship, where Strata just 'builds to plans', but a full technology transfer where Strata would become a full partner."
Under the current ATR contract between Strata and Alenia Aermacchi, as well as vertical fins, Strata will go on to manufacture rudders and horizontal stabilisers for the aircraft leading to it becoming the sole supplier of the whole ATR tail section, known as the empennage, delivering up to 50 sections a year.


Mubadala's Strata Manufacturing plant in Al Ain that began operations in 2010, will initially manufacture ribs for the vertical tailplane of the 787, and full tailfin manufacture will follow once the plant and workforce have been brought on line.


05 December 2012

Liebherr-Aerospace to provide also the A350-1000 nose landing gear


Airbus has recently selected Liebherr-Aerospace to provide the nose landing gear for the A350-1000. Thus, the airframer has extended Liebherr’s scope of supply for this aircraft, which already included the slat actuation system and flap components. This is the largest landing gear that Liebherr has ever developed and built.

Liebherr-Aerospace Lindenberg GmbH (Germany) will design, manufacture and service the nose landing gear using the experience gained in developing the system for the A350-900 program.

A scale model of the Airbus A350 XWB nose landing gear.

The company has chosen high-strength 300M steel for the nose landing gear and innovated cadmium-substitute coatings. Moreover, for surface-protection Liebherr-Aerospace has selected a high-strength alloy, which is produced using the HVOF (high velocity oxygenated fuel spraying) process.

For Nose Landing Gear, the workpackage remains in Germany for the new A350-1000.

04 December 2012

A350 XWB is on its wheels

Airbus has successfully completed the main structural assembly and system connection of A350 XWB MSN1, the first flight test aircraft.

 click on the image to watch the video

As we can watch in the video, the aircraft was moved from the main assembly station (station 40) to the indoor ground test station (station 30) at the Toulouse Final Assembly Line.

 

The assembly work performed in station 40 included:

·         The wing join-up

·         The Horizontal Stabilizer installation

·         The Vertical Fin installation

·         The Rear fuselage section19.1 join-up

·         The main landing gear installation

·         The Pylons join-up

·         The successful electrical power-on of the aircraft's entire fuselage & wings

 Next step, station 30 start by filling of the aircraft's hydraulic system and leak tests.