11 October 2015

Can you imagine flying in a A350 for up to 19 hours?

An ultra-long range version of the new Airbus A350 could fly for up to 19 hours, ushering in a new wave of non-stop flights, although they could also challenge passengers' patience.



Airbus CEO Fabrice Brégier said that his company is running the numbers on the long-legged jet, which would be based on the A350-900 and has been dubbed the 'A350-900LR'.


"We are studying it, we are not developing it" Brégier qualified, when asked about this latest skew on the A350 family during a press briefing in Toulouse.

Source: Airbus

"We know the A350 would be capable of what we call ultra-long range missions, flights of 18 or 19 hours, with some limited modifications" Brégier said.


"It's a niche market," Brégier added, saying the A350-900LR would add to the overall appeal of the A350 line-up, which from mid-2017 will include the larger A350-1000.


Source: Getty Images


"We  see customers who want the versatility of the family, so if they want to try long range we can also offer that."


The 900LR variant would see additional fuel tanks added to the A350-900 to boost its range.


Source: Jujug Spotting


Airbus executive vice president for strategy and marketing, Kiran Rao, recently suggested the A350-900LR would carry fewer passengers, saying "I can’t go into details on the type of layouts they’re looking at but it would be a premium service."

Source: Airbus

Singapore Airlines has been lobbying both Airbus and Boeing for a globe-spanning jet, which would allow it to resume non-stop flights between Singapore and the USA, potentially including a 19 hour trek to New York.


The airline previously ran ‘all business class’ flights to Los Angeles and NY-adjacent Newark on the older four-engined Airbus A340 but axed the service in 2013 due to the rising fuel costs.

Based on the article “'Ultra long range' Airbus A350 will mean non-stop 19 hour flights” published in Australian Business Traveller

10 comments:

  1. Would this have to be recertified?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The modifications obviously would need a cert.
      which would be minimal for the "A350-900lr"
      ( MTOW boost ( 280t versus 275t increase already from 268t ) + containerized AUX tankage), lighter everything.

      much higher for the orignal A350-900R: backport of
      the -1000 wing, gears, whatnot ..
      ( actually more like a complete -1000 wing/gears/middle-fuselage
      + -800 head and tail )

      Airbus has a knack for low hanging fruit improvements. cue A330.
      while Boeing seems to go for significant redesigns to capability upgrade their models.

      Delete
    2. Whatever.
      7 A350-900-LR seem to have been sold to SQ for delivery 2018 onwards. tentative range 8,700nm

      Delete
  2. It will allow a flight between Perth to LHR?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Aircraft would obviously do the distance but how many passengers would want to stay on any aircraft for 19hrs? Bad enough with 12 hour flights!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Has the A350-900LR an ETOPS of more than 370minutes?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would there be a need?
      370 minutes already doesn't leave all that much "off limits".

      Delete
  6. Would 8700 nm be enough? Didn't the A345 have over 9000 nm and still needed modifications to fly that route? Why not go for the 777-8 then or ask for the original -900R?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Would 8700 nm be enough? Didn't the A345 have over 9000 nm and still needed modifications to fly that route? Why not go for the 777-8 then or ask for the original -900R?

    ReplyDelete